Resuscitation
Along
with early excision and grafting, one of the central tenets of current
burn
care is fluid resuscitation of the burn victim. Many different methods have
been
proposed, all valid, but with no universal acceptance for one formula. They
vary
in their use of crystalloid and colloid components and are in continuing
evolution
as we understand the pathophysiology of the burn wound better. The
most
important principle in burn resuscitation is that any of these formulas are
only
guidelines and individual fluid requirements are to be judged by clinical and
hemodynamic
parameters as endpoints. Without adequate resuscitation, tissue
perfusion
suffers and the burn shock cascade is perpetuated. Delay to adequate
resuscitation
is one of the factors identified with increased mortality.
One
of the many functions of the skin is to maintain fluid and electrolyte
hemostasis.
After
burn injury, the integrity of skin is lost and leakage of plasma occurs.
This
is complicated by edema secondary to loss of endothelial integrity and
further
sequestration of fluid in tissues not directly affected by the burn itself.
Thermal
injuries of greater than 30% have been demonstrated to initiate a cascade
of
inflammatory mediators leading to capillary leak that lea ds to the anasarca
in
unburned areas and pulmonary edema. These mediators include histamine,
bradykinin,
and serotonin but the exact mechanism to initiate the cascade
has
not been elucidated. Attempts at modulation of the cascade are reported, but
have
not been successfully applied in a clinical setting. Adequate resuscitation
aims
to
counter these effects and reduce this process of postburn shock.
Intravenous
access should be established early in the initial evaluation of the
burn
patient after the airway has been secured according to standard trauma
protocols.
Peripheral,
large bore IVs provide excellent access and can actually administer
greater
volumes of fluid due to diminished resistance of the catheter secondary
to
a shorter length. Central venous access may be difficult to establish with the
crowding
of people around the torso of a newly arrived trauma victim, and also
carry
risks of pneumothorax or inability to control bleeding from inappropriate
placement.
In children it can be particularly difficult to establish intravenous access,
and
the intra-osseous route can be used emergently for fluids and medicines.
Calculations
of fluid requirements are based on the amount of body surface
involved
in second or third degree burns (not first-degree burns). The “Rule of
Nines”
has been used to estimate the body surface area burned (Fig. 3.1), but this
does
have limitations in the pediatric population where the head is proportionally
larger
than the body when compared to the adult. Modifications of this burn diagram
are
available (Fig 3.2) or nomograms are available as well (Fig 3.3) to calculate
body
surface area and percent burn. On a more practical note, knowing that
the patient’s palm (not the examiner’s) is
equal to 1% of total body surface, body
surface
area (BSA) burned can be estimated by “patting out” the burned areas
when
a quick evaluation is needed.
ادامه مطلب
برچسب ها :
دفعات بازدید : 347
نوشته شده در تاریخ 1391/10/20 و در ساعت : 11:40 - نویسنده : departman-burn